SCV Talk · Archive
Nine years of the Valley’s town square · 2006–2015
SCV Talk
February 25, 2010· scvtalk.com · WordPress (SCVTalk 3.0) · Wayback capture

Tony ‘Tenther’ Strickland introduces bill to outlaw Obamacare

Image not recovered3495310256_7d267ca298_o.jpg

Do you trust this man?

I’ve never been sure what to make of our State Senator Tony Strickland. The 6’5 Republican won a squeaker in 2008 and from his time in Sacramento he’s trended (in my view, perhaps not legislatively) more Cameron Smyth than George Runner (the other -much shorter- senator who represents the SCV).

But no longer: Senator Tony Strickland has thrown down the gauntlet and is making a bold play for the Tea Party/Tenther crowd after introducing a bill that would require California voters to approve Obamacare.

Wuzzat you say?

Take it away KHTS:

This morning State Senator Tony Strickland proposed Senate Constitutional Amendment 29, which if passed will require voter approval of any state or federal measure implementing a healthcare program that:

  • Requires individuals to obtain health coverage;
  • Requires individuals to guarantee issuance of health coverage;
  • Creates a “pay or play” system for employers;
  • Creates a government entity to compete with private plans;
  • Creates a single-payer healthcare system.

According to Strickland’s office, the amendment would affect any healthcare program containing at least one of those provisions created after January 1, 2010.

KHTS says that if Strickland can’t get this Amendment past the Senate and Assembly, he’ll likely try to push it onto the November 2010 ballot.

Earlier I said Strickland was making a play for the “Tenther” crowd. What’s a Tenther? Tenthers are conservatives who have developed a new-found* admiration for the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution in the last 12 months. Broadly defined, they are folks who are using the Tenth Amendment (the one that says all powers not enumerated for the Federal government are reserved for the states) to derail any and all federal legislation they don’t like. Tenther Hall of Famers include:

  • Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, who, in September said health care reform might be unconstitutional
  • Texas Governor Rick Perry who threatened secession last summer
  • South Carolina representative Mike Pitts, who has introduced legislation that would replace the US Dollar with gold and silver coins in South Carolina
  • Michele Bachmann, Minnesota Congresswoman
  • Southern Secessionists and slave-owners of the 19th Century

With his Constitutional Amendment, Strickland is essentially arguing the same thing, saying, in effect, that the Federal government is constitutionally prohibited from passing health care reform and Californians would only receive its benefits if they approved of it in a subsequent vote.

It’s a pretty brilliant play for Strickland, who up until now has labored in relative obscurity compared with say, George Runner. This may get him on the map, nationally, if the other states’ Tenther movements are any indication.

What if Obamacare passes and Strickland has his way? Well all the good things in the bill -no more cancellation of policies over pre-existing conditions, the creation of state exchanges that would improve competition and lower costs- would not “become effective or be enforced in this state unless the statute or program is approved by the voters,” he told the VeCo STAR.

Even though I’m a supporter of health care reform, President Obama, and the Democrats in Congress, I’m more than a little pleased by this development. It’s so cool that we have a real Tenther in California and he represents a district in this valley, which is apparently becoming something of a mecca for Tea Party crowd, judging by the last several weeks.

* I say new found because these same folks didn’t seem to have a problem with federal legislation when President Bush was signing into law the $1.2 trillion Medicare drug entitlement bill or No Child Left Behind

Tony ‘Tenther’ Strickland introduces bill to outlaw Obamacare

Comments (10)

  1. CrumbandGinFebruary 25, 2010 at 7:29 pm
    Some states are requiring that candidates for president present evidence of their Constitutional qualifications for office before their name can appear on the ballot in 2012. It is time to get back to the basics.
  2. mikecFebruary 25, 2010 at 9:05 pm
    Correct me if I’m wrong, but if TS wanted something on the November ballot doesn’t he have to turn in the signatures by June? Cause I can tell you that his bill ain’t getting out of comm!
  3. mikeFebruary 25, 2010 at 9:33 pm
    The legislature can get it on the ballot as well, but I think it takes a 2/3rds vote. Considering the GOP has a hair over 1/3 of the legislature and the amendment is just a block on a popular Democratic policy initiative, I can’t think of a proposal that has less of a chance. Considering that, it seems silly that KHTS would run this like an actual event involving a proposal that might actually go somewhere. Never mind that it’s unconstitutional (US), on its face.
  4. CrumbandGinFebruary 26, 2010 at 3:21 am
    Mike knows better than to extend debate on the front page, confusing those who do not possess the grey matter necessary to venture into the basement. The significance of Obama is that the citizens are relearning their Constiution and reclaiming the concept of federalism. A number of states are passing legislation regarding the manufacture of guns and ammunition for in state use. Utah is among these. I hope Tony has follow on legislation in CA to do the same for us.
  5. Spineflower2February 26, 2010 at 7:06 am
    Aren’t these the same conservative wackos who wanted a national Constitutinal amendment banning gay marriage? What happened to the 10th in that case? A laughably ignorant and partisan move. The continued whining of the right is revealing them to be nothing more than hypocritical crybabies.
  6. mike cFebruary 26, 2010 at 8:42 am
    Crumbandgin, I don’t see it getting on the ballot in time for November via the state leg. That being said, if he had to obtain signatures, when is the cut-off date to turn them in to the Secretary of State? I think they would need to be turned in by June? If so, time is of the essence and he would probably have to wait until the 2012 election cycle..
  7. Spineflower2February 26, 2010 at 9:09 am
    Just ask the folks who are trying to run medical pot dispensaries in Calo how well the states do when trying to override federal law. Funny, I don’t see any 10thers protesting what the feds are trying to do in overriding California Prop 215. So it can be seet this is not actually about state’s rights, it’s about more partisan stonewalling from the right.
  8. Spineflower2February 26, 2010 at 11:05 am
    Damn, I gotta get spell check installed…
  9. navigatorFebruary 26, 2010 at 12:40 pm
    Spiny, You need to drift back toward center just a bit. Your constant dissing of the right is getting stale.
  10. spineflower2February 26, 2010 at 3:15 pm
    I’m not here to be fresh, I’m here to call it like I see it. It’s the hypocrisy of the right that is getting old…

Preserved as part of the SCV Talk Archive. Text is presented as originally published; presentation has been standardised for readability. The original capture is available at the Internet Archive.

Support