What’s going on with the Johnny Pride case? Why was he arrested and placed in the slammer on $500k bail only to be released the next day?
An anonymous emailer speculates:
It is generally the policy of the LA District Attorney and LASD SVB to not arrest people for statutory rape until confirming DNA evidence is gathered and processed. Based upon the timeline of the complaint this DNA evidence would have been available sometime one to two weeks ahead of the actual election or maybe even after the election.
The SVB detectives, perhaps not understanding local politics very well, had a Patrick Fitzgerald moment. Like the intrepid US Attorney from Chicago who felt he needed to act quickly to stop Ron Blagoavich from selling a Senate seat, the detectives worried they would be savaged for letting someone under an active investigation for rape get elected to the City Council. So they arrested JP quicker than normal.
On Friday, bureaucratic laziness kicked in. Someone in the DA’s office said to release him because the arrest had come too soon. The LASD, knowing this would cause them pain, decided to pin it on the DA saying the DA had “dismissed” the case for insufficient evidence.
As this was getting ALL over local media the spokesperson for the DA’s office backtracked and said they could not confirm the actual dismissal. There will be a flurry of activity on Monday (3-8) and a probable arrest warrant issued.
This is all speculation and should be treated as such. But it sounds like a possible, if not plausible, scenario to me.
Comments (9)