SCV Talk · Archive
Nine years of the Valley’s town square · 2006–2015
SCV Talk
December 24, 2009· scvtalk.com · WordPress (SCVTalk 3.0) · Wayback capture

Target Parking Lot Demolition Derby-A More Detailed View

The Signal provided a short front page report this morning on an incident in the Target parking lot that occurred on Christmas Eve Eve (12-23).  This post will provide a more detailed report from one of the victims, my Nebraska Bride Nancy, whose car was  struck by the alleged drunk driver.

Apocryphal Valencia pride tales assert that that the Target store at McBean and Magic Mountain Parkway boasts the highest sales per square foot of any Store in the system.  True or false, on this Christmas Eve Eve Target was Soylent Green crowded and my Bride had dropped in to return a gift and obtain a refill of a Starbucks black ice tea.

Literally while in line for the tea Nancy heard people discussing a spectacular accident in the parking lot.  She was astounded because she had just stepped in from the parking lot and had seen nothing but walked outside to see carnage.  Here is what eye witnesses (who were generous with their time and contact information for future legal action) recounted.

The alleged perpetrator, parked in the handicapped parking in an older maroon Mercedes, first backed into one car, and then repositioned her car to drive “through” the handicapped parking spaces, backing into Nancy’s vehicle so hard that she drove it into the car next to her (remarkably undamaged) until her gears ground.  She then drove through the crowded crosswalk with pedestrians frantically pushing others to safety.  She barely missed a pickup truck driven by an off duty Highway Patrolman but struck a Honda with a mother and daughter.  The Patrolman then jumped from his truck and removed the keys from the Mercedes.

Reports indicate the alleged perpetrator had a half empty vodka bottle in the passenger compartment which she claimed to not have drunk from for four hours.  Nancy, who has endured her second crash in the last twelve months (this summer a distracted but sober driver crashed into her car stopped at a red light in the turning lane at Orchard Village and Wiley Canyon) attempted to approach the lady.  Sheriff’s deputies dissuaded her from “talking” to the alleged perpetrator.

This occurred at three in the afternoon, and it is difficult to imagine what would motivate a person to drink half a bottle of vodka before 11 in the morning and then decide to go to a crowded retail establishment.  Luckily, it appears that only property was seriously damaged but many pedestrians were put at risk.

This counts as a beautiful purpose of this blog, since it provides the opportunity for more detail and nuance, and followup regarding the actual identity of the alleged perpetrator as we pursue legal recourse for the repair of Nancy’s vehicle.

Target Parking Lot Demolition Derby-A More Detailed View

Comments (21)

  1. spineflower2December 24, 2009 at 12:33 pm
    Glad no one was hurt! What a hassle for you in what should be a season of peace. At least the perp is evident, guilty as hell, and (drumroll please…) hopefully fully insured.
  2. Berta González-HarperDecember 24, 2009 at 1:36 pm
    Tim, I am very happy to hear no one was seriously injured. People driving under the influence just don’t seem to get it. I would like to see even stiffer penalties to get these folks off of the roads. Kudos to the off duty Highway Patrol Officer for having the good sense to take this woman’s keys before she kills someone! Count your blessings that your Nebraska bride will spend the holidays with you and not in a hospital or worse because of a drunk driver. Somebody up there likes you Tim… Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
  3. blazingmonkDecember 24, 2009 at 1:40 pm
    Wow Amazing no one was hurt.
  4. Drive66December 24, 2009 at 1:48 pm
    Where’s the security surveillance footage. Would make for a good “Worlds Worst Drivers” segment. I’m glad no one was hurt though. P-)
  5. CCDecember 24, 2009 at 3:02 pm
    Holy Moly! Well, thankfully there were a lot of people on their toes. I thought that Target was risky this time of year, but I had no idea that it could come to this. Merry Christmas everyone and be safe.
  6. Need for Involved CitizenryDecember 24, 2009 at 9:16 pm
    Berta: I see your bashing Tim Ben Boydston again. You on Franks payroll? Think you will ever be able to move on from this?
  7. Berta González-HarperDecember 24, 2009 at 9:42 pm
    TimBen, Oops I mean Need for Involved Citizenry: I’m not bashing you simply responding to Emmy Bonja’s letter and you know it. You should have left well enough alone but like so many egotists you could not resist one more jab and on Christmas Eve no less! I’ll be able to move on when you tell the truth and my neighborhood continues to improve again. You claim to be better than the current Council folks and out to help us regular folks. I don’t think so and you keep proving me right. You like to be heard but you don’t like to listen. At least be honest with folks about your motives and that includes your anonymous postings. I wonder how all the GOBN folks and others you keep bashing, and then ask for campaign dollar support, will like knowing what you say when you think no one knows it is you saying it. I know you will just post using another alias but I warned you and Cash you reveal yourselves by your comments. By the way, I’m not on anybody’s payroll and you know that too. Coal in your stocking TimBen for being so naughty!
  8. ReaderMamaDecember 25, 2009 at 5:47 pm
    According to today’s Signal, one Susan Christensen has been charged with drunk driving in this matter. She’s due to appear in court on Feb. 22. My guess is she will attempt to argue that she’s diabetic since yesterday’s article mentioned they also found insulin in the car.
  9. Need for Involved CitizenryDecember 25, 2009 at 6:11 pm
    There you go again Berta. I’m not TimBen. He posts under his own name. Your letter to the editor did include another bash on TimBen. It was not just about Emmy Bonja. Why don’t you reread it. Get your act together! Your previous post on this blog is just another of your misrepresentations of the fact as evidenced by what you wrote in your letter to the editor. Here is a cut and paste from the Signal: “I have a problem with candidates and others who manipulate situations for their own benefit and when asked to clarify, are rude and belligerent, shouting down and berating people without hearing them out. Bonja, I hope your neighborhood works with city staff to resolve the issue, keeping in mind what is best for the entire city. I was not heard, supported or assisted by Boydston. Not now nor a few years ago. But it was not campaign time then. “
  10. Berta González-HarperDecember 25, 2009 at 7:15 pm
    Hello again TimBen. You post under several names including Need for Involved Citizenry. I find that moniker ironic since you apparently only want those who agree with you involved. You don’t want me involved. You don’t let the facts get in the way of your position either. As I said and I repeat, I responded to Emmy Bonja’s letter. Read hers line by line and then read mine, TimBen. I was not bashing you although you have earned it. The only one bashing is you, and anonymously at that. I stated facts, stand behind my statements and use my name when making them, unlike you. People who live in glass houses should not be throwing rocks, TimBen. You might try listening next time. What I wrote about in my LTE is what I tried to say to you, if you had given me the opportunity instead of talking over me. The rest is because of how you reacted. I have no desire to bash you or anyone else but as I said I have a problem with the lies and manipulation of this particular situation. I also don’t respect people who hide behind phony names to try and discredit people by implying they are on “Frank’s payroll”. Come on…You are just making yourself look worse TBB. I don’t need to do it for you. Go enjoy your lovely wife and daughter!
  11. spineflower2December 25, 2009 at 9:14 pm
    Take the personal attacks offline, please. Just because the cat (Jeff) is away is no excuse for the mice to play. This isn’t the forum for it.
  12. Berta González-HarperDecember 25, 2009 at 11:23 pm
    Spineflower2, I have not said anything today that I have not said with Jeff here so your comment is incorrect. I also don’t consider any of my comments personal attacks. You are entitled to your opinion but it is just that, your opinion. Good night.
  13. cashDecember 26, 2009 at 1:35 pm
    Anyone that knows BG only need consider the source. She is definitely full of herself. In my opinion that is; which she claims we are all entitled.
  14. Need for Involved CitizenryDecember 26, 2009 at 1:45 pm
    Berta: How about if we meet personally in the next couple of days. Then you can see for yourself I’m not TimBen. Perhaps that will make you a bit less angry! I’m on the Canyon Country side of town too but closer to Sand and Soledad. The olive branch is out. Just suggest a couple of times and locations.
  15. Berta González-HarperDecember 26, 2009 at 2:33 pm
    To both Cash, hi Leon, and TimBen. I’m not angry nor full of myself despite your comments but it is my birthday today and I refuse to let either of you spoil it for me. Talk to you tomorrow…
  16. AnnetteDecember 26, 2009 at 3:07 pm
    Berta, I do not get it!! You will make incorrect allegations about posters/people on Christs’birthday, but today because it is “your” birthday you refuse to let anyone spoil it for you. And, I agree with Spineflower2 take personal attacks offline.
  17. spineflower2December 27, 2009 at 11:48 am
    This is rapidly heading for the demise of the previous boards. Berta, making it about the poster, and not the post, is why. Knock it off, or watch this forum spin in the same blue-tinged spiral and disappear in a gurgle.
  18. Berta González-HarperDecember 27, 2009 at 1:18 pm
    Annette and Spineflower2: I find your comments regarding personal attacks interesting. I respond to what they are saying about me and defend myself and you take me to task, not them. That is your right but it makes me question your sense of fair play. It was TimBen aka Need for…who started with me on Christmas Eve and Leon aka Cash who takes every opportunity to insult me. So ladies, as long as these “gentlemen” insult me, I will respond. If you don’t like it, talk to them. This blog is for people to express their opinion. If they can express theirs, I certainly can do the same. Jeff is perfectly capable of blocking posts if he chooses. I personally prefer to discuss the issues but not everyone is willing to do that. I also would mention, if you read the exchanges from a couple of days ago between others to which neither of you made any comments, your bias towards me becomes evident. You are entitled to your opinions and likes and dislikes. So am I. Have a nice Sunday afternoon.
  19. spineflower2December 27, 2009 at 11:13 pm
    “This blog is for people to express their opinion” Actually, I thought Jeff made it clear after closing a previous forum that he wanted to focus here on the news items themselves, and not make it a general place to air opinions. Perhaps when he returns he can make the ground rules clear again, so we can avoid the downfall of this blog, unlike all previuos attempts at “opinion” forums in the SCV.
  20. John AdamsDecember 28, 2009 at 10:46 am
    Have you seen the Max Baucus video? That was 1:30 in thw afternoon and he was HAMMERED! Maybe she is auditioning for a job in government
  21. brookDecember 28, 2009 at 3:13 pm
    I agree with Annette and Spineflower, enough with the discussion back and forth about what you meant or he meant or they meant vs what was perceived in your LTE, a discussion somewhere else or whether it was a personal attack or not like in this thread. Potatoe, potato. I dont want to read ongoing discussions that have absolutely nothing to do with the original posting. I come on here to read about Jeff’s posts (and now the helping hand’s posts – THANKS GUYS!). Yes “Need” started it but be the bigger person, and respect the readers of the blog and take it elsewhere or to an old blog post that was about one of your LTEs and discuss it to your heart’s content, and that way anyone else who wants to follow on can follow you guys there.

Preserved as part of the SCV Talk Archive. Text is presented as originally published; presentation has been standardised for readability. The original capture is available at the Internet Archive.

Support