SCV Talk · Archive
Nine years of the Valley’s town square · 2006–2015
SCV Talk
October 20, 2010· scvtalk.com · WordPress (SCVTalk 3.0) · Wayback capture

Foreclosure Gate : “A Pervasive Scheme”

If you thought the subprime/prime mortgage meltdown of 2008 was scary, with all the related crap –collateralized debt obligations, mortgage-backed securities, NINA loans and derivatives trading- that we were forced to learn about about back then, have I got a sequel for you.

And the sequel is even scarier than the original. Indeed, it’s even scarier than last night’s wild SCV thunderstorm.

I’m talking about Foreclosure Gate: 2010, Banker’s Head on a Stick! and it’s much easier to understand. Put simply, the banks are having trouble identifying who holds the actual paper note on your home. Hey don’t judge; you’d have trouble too: after spending a good portion of the aughts slicing and dicing, combining and splitting, and buying and selling portions of the electronic data that represents the physical mortgage note on your home, the banks are having trouble proving to the courts in several states that they actually have the right to foreclose on homeowners.

Last week Warren Olney had an entire show devoted to this subject and I highly recommend you give it a listen.

One reporter on the show mentions how a San Diego woman took out a loan for her house from Countrywide a few years ago. Recently she started receiving foreclosure notices from Deutsche Bank, which told her it was acting on behalf of Goldman Sachs. Here’s the thing: she’s never done business with either bank and she’s paid the bills on her home, but through the process of securitization, both those banks apparently own part of the mortgage on her home and think she’s due for a foreclosure.

Part of the problem relates to what is described in the show as “arcane” US Property law, in which local jurisdictions, like LA County, are the keepers of property records, deeds, and notarized housing documents. During the go-go aughts, the banks didn’t want hundreds of county bureaucracies across the nation slowing them down -there was money to be made after all!- so they invented an entire separate computerized database of mortgage documentation. Columnist Robert Scheer takes over:

Fully 65 million homes in question are tied to a computerized program, the national Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS), that is often identified in foreclosure proceedings as the owner of record.

MERS owners now include Wells Fargo, AIG, GMAC, Citigroup, HSBC, the two housing agencies and Bank of America. But the courts are increasingly challenging MERS claims to the right of foreclosure since this whole racket, which bypasses the power of counties to register property ownership, was never authorized in the law

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Last week all 50 Attorneys General joined together to announce an investigation into foreclosure processes at the nation’s largest banks. Major banks have announced a halt to foreclosures while they shred tons of documents fix their processes. Economists and real estate pros say any delay in getting these foreclosures out could ruin the still-sluggish economic recovery, let alone the housing market. This has huge implications for the fragile economy, not to mention Santa Clarita, whose main industries (home and car sales) have been hit hard by the recession.

It’s literally dizzying to think of all the crooks, frauds, swindlers and fly-by-night realty-biz hucksters who made tons of money during the 2000s. We still -two full years after the crash!- have yet to see any bankers frog marched off to jail. Our vaunted capitalist and financial system, once the envy of the world over, can’t even prove in a court of law that it owns what it says it owns. Think about that for a second. There isn’t a bank in the country with more resources than Bank of America, and even they aren’t sure what happened just a few years ago.

And that’s before we get to the equally culpable borrowers, who thought the fat times would never end. It seems homeowners who weren’t greedy, who didn’t overreach, are taking all of this on the chin. While we’ve paid our bills responsibly, our home values are declining thanks to the uncertainty and greed of the banks and some borrowers.

It makes me wonder if we’ll ever recover from this mess.

Foreclosure Gate : “A Pervasive Scheme”

Comments (7)

  1. Lori RivasOctober 20, 2010 at 9:56 am
    This American Life did a couple of shows on the housing mess: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/355/the-giant-pool-of-money and http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/390/return-to-the-giant-pool-of-money
  2. CCOctober 20, 2010 at 10:42 am
    ain’t technology great?
  3. Your Web GuruOctober 20, 2010 at 11:47 am
    As one who recently short sold his home to avoid an NOD I have one of the best “it-should-be-on-the-news” horror stories about actually PAYING BACK my arrears to my lender, only to have the lender’s legal department refuse saying the payment did not meet the past due amount. We fell behind on our mortgage due to an error on our lender’s part who recast our loan 2 years early (yes, we got one of THOSE loans as a short-term solution to increase cash flow as we invested in another rental property). In any case, the recast loan amount put us at a payment of almost $4K/per month. We were at our wits end and thought we were going to lose the house when four months later the lender sent an ‘oops’ letter saying they mistakenly recast our loan, and that our original payment and interest rates were intact. All we wanted to do was to negotiate the late fees out of our repayment as we felt that, had the lender, who shall remain nameless (INDYMAC!!), not made the mistake, we wouldn’t have fallen behind. Three hours of negotiating later the lender agreed, gave us the dollar amount and wiring instructions, and we thought our problems were solved. Three weeks later we receive a letter from IndyMac’s legal department stating the payment did not meet the obligation, and they refused it. A month and a half more of repeated phone calls (by the way, you NEVER get the same person twice) resulted in nothing being accomplished. Meanwhile, the lender was not accepting any other payments, partial or otherwise, and after three months, they filed an NOD. By this time we were completely exasperated, stressed, and just sick of it all, and we decided short selling our home was the lesser of the many evils afoot. Just to clarify, we PAID our arrears to our lender based on THEIR instructions…WIRED the money based on THEIR instructions (didn’t send a check, didn’t pull some magical dollar amount out of the own imagination)…and they refused it…and then kept us in the hopper long enough to file an NOD without ever resolving our issue. Customer service said it was a legal issue, legal wouldn’t return any calls. Yes, it’s all true. We have physical documentation as well as the people we talked to along with times and dates. It reads like a Tolstoy novel (only more depressing!). So yeah, if there are those out there who just want to blame buyers and mortgagees for helping create the mess, the banks are just as, if not more, culpable for creating an environment of greed versus actually caring about their customers. Their incredible lack of organization and examples of the ‘right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing’ is finally manifesting itself in the light of day.
  4. Coastal SageOctober 20, 2010 at 1:09 pm
    As a person who spent a lot of years as outside counsel for savings and loans and banks, doing work related to COMMERCIAL real estate loan defaults, I have some knowledge of California’s foreclosure procedures. I make the following comments, and hope each of you will tell your friends: (1) Trustee’s sale procedures, done under California law, are so complicated that most lawyers freely admit that they don’t understand the wording of California’s laws on the topic. What that means in reality is that laymen who are OUT OF STATE are clearly clueless about what California law requires, meaning in some part that they simply don’t bother to follow it. As a result, no one should assume that lenders are “following state law” on trustee’s sale foreclosure, let alone on the means of calculating the interest rate on adjustable rate mortgage, let alone on following laws relating to balloon payment. The old presumption by Superior Court judges that “lenders know the law and follow it” doesn’t hold true anymore. It’s a complete crap-shoot if one files a lawsuit to stop a wrongful foreclose, in terms of getting a judge who understands the law, let alone will hold the lender to it. (2) Many years ago the California Legislature passed a law requiring assignors and assignees of loan servicing rights to give borrowers a specific blunt notice, telling the borrower that the loan servicing or the loan itself had been assigned. The law was designed to have the assignor’s notice be a “safety check” on assignee’s notices, so that someone would not just fraudulently claim that they were the “new” rightful recipient of payments. From what I can tell, many out of state loan owners and loan servicers are simply ignoring that law. (3) Your Web Guru’s experience is not unique. A similar thing happened to my former secretary. It’s never safe to assume that residential mortgage lenders will act reasonably, or fix their own errors. They won’t, in large part because there is no culture of “customer service” at lenders and loan servicers. Why should they be reasonable when they’ve got you by the ba**s? Also, under many “Loan Servicing Agreements” the loan servicer gets to keep the late payment charges, and does not share them with the actual owner of the loan. That certainly incentivises a failure to completely rectify errors like Your Web Guru’s experiences. (4) Even more obnoxious, a California based lender started a foreclosure on my friend’s son, because the real estate taxes on his house weren’t paid. The man’s loan documents required that he have a “tax and insurance impound” which he was supposed to pay into every month, along with his monthly mortgage payment…and he did make all of the payments. The legal department wouldn’t listen to the loan servicing department, and the legal department actually foreclosed on the guy’s house. Someone else actually bought it at the foreclosure sale. My friend’s son, the victim, had a lawyer and sued the bank prior to the foreclosure. The judge wouldn’t stop the foreclosure, saying “money damages would be sufficient” and that a jury trial was required. The bank wouldn’t settle and the lender actually went to trial. A judgment for money damages against the bank was rendered. They wouldn’t pay it. They appealed. They lost. They still wouldn’t pay the judgment. At last word, the man’s lawyer was trying to execute against the bank by holding a sheriff’s sale of a bank branch. My point in bringing this up is that this bank incurred more in its own attorneys fees than the amount of the mortgage loan which it wrongfully foreclosed. My friend told me that his son’s lawyer explained the bank’s conduct by saying that any settlement by the bank would simply encourage others to sue them for wrongful treatment. Bear this in mind when trying to comprehend how banks operate: “We will spend our last dime proving we are right.” (5) If any reader or friend sees the first sign of trouble with a mortgage lender, don’t fool around trying to negotiate on your own; don’t go to a non-lawyer ‘work out consultant’; don’t go to your friendly lawyer on the corner. ONLY go to a State Bar of California certified bankruptcy law specialist, because the bankruptcy court judges are the only ones who reliably understand California’s foreclosure laws. They will stop wrongful foreclosures in the context of a Chapter 13 case. Dylan Ratigan on MSNBC calls banks “Bangsters”. I know the kind of brainless, arrogant people banks put in residential foreclosure management positions. Dylan’s right.
  5. cashOctober 20, 2010 at 2:30 pm
    I know the kind of brainless, arrogant people banks put in residential foreclosure management positions…. That’s not nice.
  6. ReaderMamaOctober 20, 2010 at 5:04 pm
    Frightening stuff indeed. It is a wonder that more people haven’t gone postal in the face of such provocation. To lose one’s home because you’re not paying the mortgage is one thing; it is quite another to lose one’s home having made all the payments on time. Web Guru, I admire your ability to handle that situation without resorting to violence! The bank spending whatever it takes to defend its very wrongful acts is believable. Some years back Farmers Insurance did the same thing fighting a legitimate class action lawsuit by its employees & former employees to be paid for their overtime. Farmers fought all the way to the SCOTUS, even though it was not a federal matter but a state issue. They did lose and finally paid up, but it took 10 years. The interest amounted to far more than the wages. What they spent in legal fees I can only imagine. I understand Disney is similar in its attitude toward any kind of legal opposition. I hope there is a special place in hell for those responsible for such injustices.
  7. damageincOctober 21, 2010 at 7:15 am
    Thank you Buck McKeon for taking a million dollars from the financial industry to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999.

Preserved as part of the SCV Talk Archive. Text is presented as originally published; presentation has been standardised for readability. The original capture is available at the Internet Archive.

Support