SCV Talk · Archive
Nine years of the Valley’s town square · 2006–2015
SCV Talk
November 3, 2010· scvtalk.com · WordPress (SCVTalk 3.0) · Wayback capture

McKeon : Then and Now

June 23:
I support all efforts to cut wasteful or unnecessary programs and reform every department in the government to make them more efficient. We simply cannot have all parts of our government growing in perpetuity with no checks on the spending levels.
November 3:
“Our citizens have spoken, and they want a defense budget that is sufficient to address the challenges of today and the threats of tomorrow.   One percent real growth in the base defense budget over the next five years is a net reduction for modernization efforts which are critical to protecting our nation’s homeland,” continued McKeon.

So, did you get that? We’ve got to root out waste, fraud and abuse in every level and layer of government, in things like education and health & social services, but when it comes to Defense we’re going to increase spending even higher than the rate Obama wants to increase it. Indeed, we’re going to reverse responsible cuts being made right now by SecDef Robert Gates….a Republican!

Must be nice to be McKeon. All throughout the spring, summer and fall you cynically play to the Tea Party, bleating on and on about the reds spending the nation into oblivion. Then, the day after you’re re-elected, you announce you’re going to see to it that the Defense Department is not only exempted from “belt tightening,” you’re going to jack up the appropriations heading toward the famous five sided building.

In their gushing endorsement of Congressman McKeon last month, The Signal pined for this very scenario, saying McKeon defense pork “should greatly benefit the growing SCV aerospace sector.” That may be true and all, but, for goodness sakes, let’s just come out and say it: Buck McKeon is no fiscal conservative. He’s advocating big spending increases when the voters have clearly spoken for austerity and deficit reduction. He’s also likely to fight the President as he draws down troops on that expensive boondoggle happening in Afghanistan, a place where two fine young SCV men gave their lives this year.

At least he’s consistent on one thing. He said in the same release today that he and other Republicans, now that they’re in charge, are “committed to passing a National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 that is not weighed down by the current majority’s social agenda items.”

And so the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, which would allow gay Americans to serve in the military openly, will die an ignominious death by the hand of our 72 year old cowboy Congressman who has never served.

Bring on the redistricting.

McKeon : Then and Now

Comments (18)

  1. Coastal SageNovember 3, 2010 at 5:55 pm
    For those who have not yet read Bob Woodward’s book “Obama’s Wars” I recommend it. The one thing which the book’s content illustrates, coming from the mouths of our current Defense Secretary Gates, as well as from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, is that the ongoing cost of the war in Afghanistan and the continued occupation of Iraq is enough to bankrupt the country. Given that fact, where does Buck think he is going to find the additional money for additional Defense Department funding to modernize the military? I guess Buck better read the book and get in on the conversations with they key managers of the military before he shoots his mouth off.
  2. SCVKickstandNovember 3, 2010 at 5:55 pm
    Great article from the Christian Science Monitor http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/330810 Sound like the exact opposite of that Rep. McKeon has planned. Think we get joined with the SFV in the new district? I could live with Brad Sherman
  3. john adamsNovember 3, 2010 at 6:26 pm
    Great stuff! Now I am getting the popcorn and beer ready for the upcoming ethics trials. Should be some good stuff. I am sure jeff will have a big story on that.
  4. NickelDimeNovember 3, 2010 at 7:32 pm
    Where are you SCV Tea Party / Tea Party Roundtable / Chris Lim ?
  5. NateNovember 3, 2010 at 10:52 pm
    Purring for the Republican establishment… Their brains are mush.
  6. BrianNovember 3, 2010 at 8:45 pm
    Can we tell the truth? It’s not defense spending. It’s Offense spending! There is little of anything we have which is for defense, as was the ABM system. The single biggest budget buster and this yahoo wants to make it bigger. Does anyone invision a massive war with armies of tens of thousands on a battlefield anymore? What part of an F-22 is used to kill bin Ladin and why is he still alive? Oh yeah, we don’t think about him much anymore. WHAT ARE WE DOING?
  7. Sergeant First Class PerezNovember 3, 2010 at 8:51 pm
    SecDef Gates was brought on board by then President Bush for a reason. He is a no non-sense leader who looks at a project based off of current and future need, not because a Congressman was lobbied by that weapons manufacturer. President Eisenhower, who led the Allies victory in WW2, hit the nail on the head when he observed the power of the industrial military sector. We as Soldiers are concerned with technology but there is often not a focus on competitive bidding and decision based off quality. Keep more of the R-n-D in house with the military and the focus moves to accountability both in success and fiscal responsibility. One of the biggest weapons we have in the military though is our outreach programs where we go to these impoverished nations and assist with engineering and medical support. You would be surprised how much harder it is to wins someones heart than to make it stop beating but one equals actual victory.
  8. Sergeant First Class PerezNovember 3, 2010 at 9:01 pm
    And this is apparently how we deal with After-Election politics in my state of residence http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/kirk-giannoulias-billy-goat-beer-summit-106649248.html
  9. Bill ReynoldsNovember 3, 2010 at 9:02 pm
    All this angst over the GOP/Tea Party avalanche is just sooo entertaining. Bring it on Boys, let the whining continue. Hahahaha!
  10. NateNovember 3, 2010 at 10:49 pm
    Tea party made zero impact in fact they caused major issues in races that the GOP could have easily won. Republican establishment has to know that now, really are these Republican lap dogs like Bill Reynolds and John Adams really going to go against the mainstream? NOPE they are followers they take ORDERS remember John Adam’s massive GAFFEE saying Democrats didn’t “CONTROL” there people. Republicans just like every cult goose step together…. HAHA
  11. NickelDimeNovember 4, 2010 at 6:24 am
    Does the new majority not bear responsibility?
  12. Samuel AdamsNovember 3, 2010 at 9:32 pm
    Bring on redistricting? The state is already blue….
  13. NateNovember 3, 2010 at 10:46 pm
    Getting ready to organize my own tea party against the wasteful Republican spending… which is 100% going to happen. I wanna get a jump on it like the Republican’s did to Obama. Who is with me!
  14. BrianNovember 4, 2010 at 12:43 am
    More tears from the right, this time Boehner, again. What the hell is with you guys and your water works? Give it a rest already!
  15. CastaicClayNovember 4, 2010 at 9:32 am
    Russia (USSR) went broke fighting in Afghanistan. Is history repeating itself with the USA this time? 70+ year old politicians need to get out.
  16. Petz2November 4, 2010 at 10:51 am
    Kind of strange that creeper Obama makes his first call to Buck McKeon and the topic on the table is DADT.
  17. Josh PremakoNovember 4, 2010 at 12:07 pm
    Congressman McKeon is the likely new chair of the House Armed Services Committee. DADT has been sort of a major issue of late. How is this strange? Further, how about referring to “creeper Obama” as President Obama?
  18. Sergeant First Class PerezNovember 4, 2010 at 8:04 pm
    The 2011 NDAA was not approved due to Congress and Senate going on break. I am sure they wouldnt do the same when their annual pay increase was being voted on. The one thing both sides of the aisle can consistenly agree upon, if the only thing, is that they are deserving of high pay for little work or risk. And that it should increase annually. They have no issue giving the military a meager 1.9 or 1.4% base pay increase but yet cry fiscal cutbacks while stuffing their own pockets. I dont think what happened on Tuesday is going to help us in the military one iota but I do have to say from the pay perspective, this last years increase was a total sham.

Preserved as part of the SCV Talk Archive. Text is presented as originally published; presentation has been standardised for readability. The original capture is available at the Internet Archive.

Support