SCV Talk · Archive
Nine years of the Valley’s town square · 2006–2015
SCV Talk
October 24, 2011· scvtalk.com · WordPress (SCVTalk 3.0) · Wayback capture

Hot girl prances at Lombardi’s, SCV kicks her out

By Jeff — Jeff Wilson

Daisy Dukes + 17 year old + SCV = today’s #1 clicked on story on SCVTalk:

‘Teen bride’ Courtney Stodden and husband Doug Hutchison were tossed from a pumpkin patch in the Santa Clarita Valley over the weekend, after fellow pumpkin prospectors complained the amorous May-December couple had behaved inappropriately at the family-geared venue.

Onlookers also complained that Courtney — wearing Daisy Dukes and a plaid shirt tied to show off her flat belly — was not dressed appropriately for the patch. After Courtney, 17, and Doug, 51, were 86’ed from the patch, they went to a nearby area where Courtney struck some sexy poses for the camera.

I have no idea who Courtney Stodden is (and Googling for her at work is probably inadvisable) but Radar Online’s & the HuffPo’s pictures of what she and her beau were doing at our lovely Lombardi’s Ranch will steam your monitor up.

I understand the reaction of SCV families, and you know what else? I wish I was there to see them freak out about it, because I guarantee you it would have been comedy gold.

Click on through if you want to see.

Comments (45)

  1. HeatherOctober 24, 2011 at 1:05 pm
    First of all, those boots are perfect pumpkin patch attire. I wear my pair whenever I’m weeding the garden or taking out the trash. Secondly, this story would garner less attention if SCV kicked them out for not having the proper permits for a photo shoot on city property.
  2. Timothy Myers SROctober 24, 2011 at 1:22 pm
    Lombardi’s is not city property.
  3. Timothy Myers SROctober 24, 2011 at 1:13 pm
    That’s the creepy 51 year old guy from Lost who married that 17 year old aspiring country singer! Who knew their staged paparazzi pictures would make it to the SCV! Knew I would have gone on Saturday instead of Sunday.
  4. 4eyedsueOctober 24, 2011 at 1:26 pm
    she was barley 16 at the time of the wedding
  5. Mr PerezOctober 24, 2011 at 4:07 pm
    Was she wheat as well? lol
  6. 4eyedsueOctober 24, 2011 at 9:11 pm
    doh!
  7. lvogelOctober 24, 2011 at 1:24 pm
    The guy was creepy and vulgar in The Green Mile and after seeing him (and her) in an interview, found he’s even creepier in his personal life. But it’s a free country and this 17 year old woman/child got permission from her family to marry this man/child.
  8. Mr PerezOctober 24, 2011 at 1:25 pm
    While I am the farthest thing from a religious prude, I don’t get why people feel the need to constantly push the card when it comes to personal expression. There is a major difference between being you and wanting to get people’s attention and some it borders on a mental health issue. And minus the physical relationship, what in the hell do these two have in common? I could not see myself marrying someone young enough to be my daughter, or granddaughter in this case. She can call it judgmental all she wants but she put herself in that light.
  9. Hmmm...October 24, 2011 at 1:28 pm
    “While I am the farthest thing from a religious prude, I don’t get why people feel the need to constantly push the card when it comes to personal expression.” Saying that you are the farthest thing means that you are the closest thing.
  10. Mr PerezOctober 24, 2011 at 1:41 pm
    Yes, I’m a total effin’ Mullah. You pinged it right on the IP Address Slick!
  11. LarMccOctober 24, 2011 at 1:29 pm
    Take a look at picture #4. That says it all. I really could care less if my two boys witness her parading around with her rear end hanging out and dry humping her grandfather/husband. But I can understand other people may not want to witness this.
  12. 4eyedsueOctober 24, 2011 at 1:29 pm
    They are just another couple of publicity whores who cannot make it on talent so they must continually be outrageous to get their mugs in the media. Next she’ll be on DWTS.
  13. Mr PerezOctober 24, 2011 at 1:43 pm
    Or a reality show: “So I Married A Grandfather.” Or “somehow” a video of their honeymoon escapades will find it’s way to Vivid. Gag at old man grey body hair!
  14. JaneOctober 25, 2011 at 2:36 pm
    Reminds me of the films Clint Eastwood has done recently with his sunken chest and saggy (yes, even skinny people can be saggy) body on display. I thought, I don’t want to see this.
  15. Mr PerezOctober 25, 2011 at 4:50 pm
    And there goes dinner! lol
  16. SamOctober 24, 2011 at 1:43 pm
    She was dressed as Barbie but without the tattoos.
  17. Your Web GuruOctober 24, 2011 at 2:04 pm
    Wow! Talk about your daddy issues!
  18. Mr PerezOctober 24, 2011 at 2:32 pm
    Or even Granddaddy issues
  19. Timothy Myers SROctober 24, 2011 at 3:26 pm
    I would recommend for the rest of the season not eating the corn on the cob because you just never know!
  20. SCVTeachOctober 24, 2011 at 3:57 pm
    Not long ago, I was in the waiting room at my doctor’s office here in the SCV. These two were on some interview show. Everyone in the waiting room was so disgusted that the receptionist turned the channel. Please tell me they don’t live here.
  21. Timothy Myers SROctober 24, 2011 at 4:16 pm
    Oh no!!! There are pumpkin patches everywhere including a really exclusive one in Beverly Hills so it is almost a mathematical certainty that their choice was based on proximity. Yikes and double yikes!!!!!!
  22. PetzOctober 24, 2011 at 4:38 pm
    Speaking of Harrison Katz…
  23. lvogelOctober 24, 2011 at 5:19 pm
    The happy couple (and the pumpkin patch) made it on Anderson Coopers ‘Ridiculist’, once again. These two will be as famous as The Kardashians and Jersey Shore, when their reality (yeah right) show airs.
  24. PackfanOctober 24, 2011 at 6:27 pm
    Now the city must bulldoze the pumpkin patch! This must never be allowed in Santa Clarita!
  25. saysiamOctober 24, 2011 at 7:08 pm
    Lombardi’s not in City.
  26. LarMccOctober 24, 2011 at 8:07 pm
    What agency or who was it that bulldozed the old Blue Moon restaurant at 126 and the 5? They sold and reopened as a topless bar. They were open one night (as a bikini bar) and then the place was gone, as in bulldozed. Rumor was that the city was up in arms about this and had something to do with this (though this is in county area).
  27. CastaicClayOctober 25, 2011 at 7:20 am
    NL&F? The governing body of the SCV.
  28. Jim FarleyOctober 24, 2011 at 7:09 pm
    Mrs. Farley, the kids, and me stopped going to Lombardi after the kids all of a sudden became adults (at least in age). I see it is now time to reconsider visits to the pumpkin patch, wearing sunglasses of course so Mrs. Farley does not know in which direction I am looking. Oh wait, something tells me Mrs. Farley will know. Looks like I’m too late anyway.
  29. AlpinerOctober 24, 2011 at 8:26 pm
    Non-story and a waste of time.
  30. TurboFoolOctober 24, 2011 at 8:54 pm
    Yay for Puritanville. I’ve lived in Santa Clarita since ’89. Next year I get out and head somewhere where people understand that they don’t have a God-given right to not be offended by skin and happiness.
  31. Mr PerezOctober 24, 2011 at 9:12 pm
    What about a right not to have your children exposed to scantily clad adult activities at a family farm? I don’t believe anyone here told the weirdos not to dress or act in a certain manner but more so it was about time and place. I am sure if I was a waiter at a restaurant you wouldn’t be too keen if I served you in a man-thong with my junk all in your face
  32. Gang FangOctober 24, 2011 at 9:17 pm
    I’d be cool with it, as long as I could call you “SGT. SAUSAGE”.
  33. Mr PerezOctober 24, 2011 at 9:31 pm
    Just stay in the gazer category and dont try to mustard me up
  34. Phil EllisOctober 25, 2011 at 9:21 am
    I have seen skimpier attire at the mall.
  35. Mr PerezOctober 25, 2011 at 10:14 am
    And the same parents who let their kids dress like that at the mall are of the same ilk that let their 17 yr old daughter marry a creepy 51 yr old.
  36. TurboFoolOctober 25, 2011 at 12:28 pm
    If you did, and I didn’t like it, I’d stop patronizing your restaurant. Was this girl employed at the ranch? I thought she and her boyfriend were merely visiting. In which case it’s a bunch of parents who are afraid of their kids seeing CLOTHED human bodies (Ooooh… sinful) demanding that they be ejected from the premises. Again, puritanical BS.
  37. JaneOctober 25, 2011 at 2:42 pm
    No, they weren’t just visiting. They had a camera crew to document them grinding each other. The clothing is, as someone said, not that different from what I see the kids wearing at the mall, it was the activities that went with it. But, I do have to say, some of these parents who were outraged should think about what others are seeing when their daughters are doing their little dance routines out in public, which sometimes take on a bump and grind flair. There were a bunch from one of the dance studios at the shopping center in Stevenson Ranch and my friend commented, “Where’s the pole?” They really did look like little strippers in training.
  38. TurboFoolOctober 25, 2011 at 3:24 pm
    So, in other words, they WERE just visiting in the context of my response, as in they did NOT work at the ranch as in the context of Mr. Perez’s response. And I responded particularly to complaints about her attire. I don’t know enough about their activities to comment, but supposedly some of the complaint was how she was dressed and that it was inappropriate for kids to see. Clothes are clothes, bodies are bodies. This attitude against people expressing themselves and being themselves is so ancient and pointless and backwards, and THAT is my point here. It’s far, far, FAR more disgusting than a girl in a tight shirt and short shorts.
  39. Mr PerezOctober 25, 2011 at 4:53 pm
    Since Lombardi’s is private property they have the right to enforce a dress code and remove people that offend both their’s and customer’s standards. You don’t have to like it but would you want your daughter to dress like that?
  40. Mr PerezOctober 25, 2011 at 8:53 pm
    And the context of my comment was not that they worked at Lombardi’s but it is regardless if they were employees or customers in that they subjected everyone else to their antics. That’s not being a responsible citizen.
  41. 4eyedsueOctober 24, 2011 at 9:21 pm
    Oh Turbo, that’s so sweet. “Maybe” all that was just an innocent expression of love and happiness ~ not just another obnoxious publicity stunt (that worked). Thought you all might enjoy Courney’s music video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOrD5kqyov0 You’re welcome! ; )
  42. TurboFoolOctober 25, 2011 at 12:30 pm
    And…? What if it was a publicity stunt? Clearly everyone played right into their hands. And what do I care? Again, she was fully-clothed, just not in attire that prudish SCVers liked. I think the reaction’s absurd. And the video’s awful, as you know. And irrelevant.
  43. Mr PerezOctober 25, 2011 at 4:55 pm
    If your shorts don’t cover your azz cheeks that is not fully clothed nor about being prudish.
  44. JayceOctober 26, 2011 at 12:25 pm
    GAH Sue! The things that cannot be unseen. I love the comment “…And suddenly Rebecca Black seems like a lyrical genius.”
  45. scvgalOctober 25, 2011 at 8:24 pm
    I really don’t think it was her outfit that was a big deal. I think it was the playboy poses and straddling her husband and the pumpkins. I don’t care if she wants to do that but she shouldn’t be doing it at a venue geared towards kids and families. If you look through all the pictures that were taken they really are not appropriate for the venue.

Preserved as part of the SCV Talk Archive. Text is presented as originally published; presentation has been standardised for readability. The original capture is available at the Internet Archive.

Support