SCV Talk · Archive
Nine years of the Valley’s town square · 2006–2015
SCV Talk
September 17, 2014· santaclarita.com · SantaClarita.com (SCVTalk 5.0) · Wayback capture

For Some Reason, Steve Knight is Bringing Tim Donnelly to the SCV

Image not recoveredTD-SK.jpg
Let's begin with a little (rough) math. This June, 42% of primary voters didn't vote for either Knight or Strickland, and somewhere between two and three times as many people will vote in November than voted in June. This means that only about 20% of voters in November would have voted for either Knight or Strickland. And of that remaining 80%, over half would rather be voting for a Democrat. 
With that in mind, imagine my surprise this morning when I see that Jean Merl of the LA Times reports this morning that none other than Tim Donnelly, the Minuteman-turned-Assemblyman who was nearly the GOP gubernatorial nominee, will be knocking doors with Steve Knight on Saturday right here in Santa Clarita. 
It's timely, as Tim Donnelly has the distinction of being the only member of the Assembly to vote against AB 2444, the bill that, if signed by Gov. Brown, will prohibit the state from displaying the Confederate battle flag or selling items depicting it. When that bill came to the Senate a few months later, Steve Knight voted with Donnelly, to the astonishment of many, myself included.
Knight also endorsed Donnelly for Governor in this year's primary. Despite being the frontrunner for much of the race, Donnelley's website only claimed the endorsement of four members of the State Assembly, and just two State Senators: Steve Knight and Joel Anderson – who happens to be the other guy who voted no on AB 2444 (and the lone member of the Legislature who voted to keep homosexuality classified as a mental illness).
Then there's this: rumors have been circulating that Donnelly has his eye on Steve Knight's Senate seat, should Knight win in November. 
Apart from being one of the most rightward politicians in Sacramento, Tim Donnelly is a little nuts.
In April, Buzzfeed got their hands on a 2006 speech of Donnelly's which contained the following gems (follow this link for the full audio):
“In the name of diversity, we are bringing millions of people into our country who want nothing to do with diversity,” he said. “Their creed is for anyone in the Hispanic race: everything. For anyone outside it, nada. Nothing.”
“I am a decedent of Jim Bowie, who died at the Alamo,” Donnelly said. “It is rumored that he took a dozen Mexican soldiers to their deaths before they finally killed him. How many of you will rise up and take his place on that wall?”
He said there was “a growing insurgency, right here in Los Angeles” and other cities, and compared it to insurgencies in cities like “Baghdad, Samarra, and Tikrit.” 
Oh boy.
More recently, Donnelly accused his primary opponent Neel Kashkari of "submitting" to Sharia law, which was an especially odd charge as Kashkari is not a Muslim, but a non-practicing Hindu.
This led Darrell Issa to rip him to pieces: "As far as I'm concerned, this type of stupidity disqualifies Tim Donnelly from being fit to hold any office, anywhere. Donnelly is no longer a viable option for California voters."
I'm unsure why Knight would endorse a fringe character like Donnelly, much less trumpet his endorsement. But I'm completely stumped as to why he'd actually invite Donnelly to town, at this point in an election which will likely be decided by as-yet-undecided Democratic voters.
Update: Here's a screenshot Donnelly's email:




For Some Reason, Steve Knight is Bringing Tim Donnelly to the SCV

Comments (12)

  1. I Stand With KnightlandWednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 7:52 am
    Does this mean the rumor that Knight & Donnelly will be at the opening of the new Vallarta in CC isn't true?
  2. David Barlavi, Esq.Wednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 9:00 am
    ...vote FOR [or against?] AB 2444... "It's timely, as Tim Donnelly has the distinction of being the only member of the Assembly to vote FOR [or against?] AB 2444, the bill that, if signed by Gov. Brown, will prohibit the state from displaying the Confederate battle flag or selling items depicting it. When that bill came to the Senate a few months later, Steve Knight voted with Donnelly, to the astonishment of many, myself included." ___________________________________ To answer your question Mike, Knight is probably trying to mirror a certain "Veteran's liaison" of Strickland's here in the SCV...
  3. MikeWednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 11:04 am
    Fixed! Thanks.
  4. David Barlavi, Esq.Wednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 11:15 am
    Welcome. Where do I send the bill?
  5. Bill ReynoldsWednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 9:41 am
    Now, now David... I realize that you are still smarting over Lee Rogers' disastrous June 3rd Primary loss but you know we got along very well at your "Wings Stogie Night" a few months back. Best wishes...
  6. timothymyers02Wednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 9:42 am
    Strickland is doing everything "right" to win this election by attracting the right amount of center left voters from cleansing his website of anti-Obama diatribes to spending a lot of campaign time in the Antelope Valley to narrow the difference there. Steve Knight seems to be making every possible wrong move which is surprising considering that Scott Wilk is so heavily involved in that campaign. IF I were voting in the 25th District (spending all my time now in South Orange County voting for geography Republicans) with the possibility that Tim Donnelly might be the state senator in Knight's seat if he wins I would be inclined to vote for Tony Strickland (gasp) just to avoid that humiliation.
  7. AndieWednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 10:13 am
    Are we allowed to write in candidates? Because that's the only option I can think of that doesn't make me want to throw up. Both men are repulsive human beings.
  8. Bill ReynoldsWednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 10:20 am
    Andie, that is a ridiculous statement. Both men are good family men & I seriously doubt that you have ever spoken to either if them.
  9. MikeWednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 11:04 am
    But to answer your question, no, not under the top-2 law.
  10. timothymyers02Wednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 11:45 am
    Andie: I must (reluctantly :) ) agree with Bill Reynolds. I probably disagree with nearly all of their positions but I would be comfortable having them coach a sports team that my children were on. Let's give the hyperbole a rest!
  11. ErinWednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 10:23 am
    I really, really, really hope they come knock on my door this weekend. IN fact- I will give them the addy- Valencia Hills- COME ON OVER BOYS... let's talk. But sorry Donnelly, you'll have to leave your shoes and your guns at the front door.
  12. DonRickettsWednesday, September 17th, 2014 at 10:35 am
    Did I read somewhere that Strickland and Knight are going to be at a Canyon Country Advisory Council affair?

Preserved as part of the SCV Talk Archive. Text is presented as originally published; presentation has been standardised for readability. The original capture is available at the Internet Archive.

Support