April 22, 2010 – Daily Brief

Regarding the Randles story, let’s remember that it was Galvan himself who made confusion with Gauny one of the “big issues” of his campaign. From the SCVMomsBlog interview: JACKIE: “David [Galvan], I have to say, um, I think you’re like the mystery candidate for some of us.” DAVID: “Yes, I would, I would have to say the same thing. You know what, it’s…it’s been a very interesting campaign. I know that I’ve talked to a few people out there and myself and David Gauny have been confused quite a bit because we have similar names” JACKIE: “Right. Maybe it’s the David G. thing?” DAVID “Yeah. So we get confused quite a bit. And what I’m trying to work on right now is actually trying to…not seper-…not necessarily separating us but kind of differentiating I’m David Galvan, and he’s David Gauny so we don’t really get confused because that seems to be the big issue right now.”

Randles has all kinds of time to do spoof pieces on David Glavan, but no time to do a follow up piece on the front page above the fold Harry Katz story he penned. Jaonathan is guilty of journalistic malpractice. This is the real conspiracy of the 2010 election.

Believe me when I tell you that the number of organizations, in business and anti-tax that oppose AB-32 and intend to work towards it’s eventual defeat number the stars. This is an ill-conceived venture launched at a time when California cannot afford it. AB-32 is a job killer and a company exporter.

Petz has had a pending LTE since last Sunday which calls upon The Signal to simply do a follow up story which fully explains the details of and confirms the source of the letter to David Gauny. To publish such a story with no follow up or investigation-to leave a cloud of confusion over three candidates prior to election day is muckraking journalism at it’s worst. To date, there has been no follow up or even a LTE from a citizen or affected candidate published. There is a conspiracy to protect Harrison Katz from the real world consequence of his action.

“Darkness Shrouds the Land?” Can we say “hyperbole?”

Poor Cam. How do you survive on your $95K salary??? Why don’t you ask the ~12% who are unemployed how they get along for pointers???

Very good and classy that David G will not spend the money on a recount. Obviously getting good advice that with a 32 vote spread a recount would be a great waste of time and money.

I’m surprised that in addition the “David Galvan was a plant” canard, Gauny hasn’t alleged that his 32 vote loss was the result of votes cast by illegals. But then again, the day isn’t over.

Although this must be a difficult loss for David , he has conducted himself with class and dignity throughout the campaign and vote count. David was subject to vicious personal attack, whisper, and innuendo, yet he remained unruffled. Petz has not heard him try to make any excuses or second guess himself-he has political future in this valley if he wants one. Gauny was way ahead of the curve on illegal immigration and he has the wounds to show for it.