SCV Talk · Archive
Nine years of the Valley’s town square · 2006–2015
SCV Talk
December 9, 2010· scvtalk.com · WordPress (SCVTalk 3.0) · Wayback capture

December 9, 2010 – Daily Brief

  • County planners say there’s not enough data on water supplies in places like west Castaic and Agua Dulce and other parts of the SCV not served by Castaic Lake Water Agency. Money quote: “It may be somewhat surprising, but since these areas are not served by the (CLWA) … there isn’t really conclusive data about what the groundwater resources are in those areas. It is an unknown.” Without real knowledge of water supplies, development could be hampered, a fact of life which probably makes many residents happy.
  • State toxic control department says a portion of the old Whittaker-Bermite site could be cleaned up and ready for use by March of 2011. SIGNAL
  • Don Ricketts, the lawyer representing the Save Our Library non-profit group, has prepared a brief he hopes people will use at the City’s first Public Library Advisory Committee meeting tonight. The brief invites the 37 committee members to challenge the City and LSSI on a whole range of issues, including the original decision to secede from COLA and privatize the system. The Library Committee, which will function more like a focus group lead by an LSSI facilitator, meets tonight at 6pm. BRIEF, CITY CALENDAR
  • Speaking of Libraries, COLA Librarian Margaret Donellan Todd spoke with KPCC’s Patt Morrison yesterday. They touched on Santa Clarita’s separation from the system. Todd says she’s concerned that some cities “are falling for a siren song” sung by a company that doesn’t have to report profits, salaries and other data. She also addressed the COLA system’s budget woes, digital downloads, and more KPCC
  • And finally, the Signal has issued a correction to their story yesterday about the County accepting $1.2 million in funds from the City for the completion of the Canyon Country library. The Signal now says that only $622,000 is required and the City has the option to purchase some $400k plus worth of furniture and materials. That still doesn’t explain the original county press release which said the City would be required to pay $1.2 million, twice what was approved at Council last week SIGNAL
  • The Ferry family blog that occasionally posts updates on Frank Ferry’s condition had this to say yesterday: “Frank is beginning to take a turn for the better. However, he still has a long road ahead of him. Today, Dec.7th, he remains in an induced coma. His blood pressure is stable and his kidneys are slowly beginning to function. A machine is helping him with 40% of his breathing. When he wakes up , he recognizes people” So that’s definitely good news. KHTS also says he’s showing signs of improvement.
  • Planning commissioner suggests periodic “checkpoint” reviews of OVOV plan after it goes into effect. Also, KHTS complaints about traffic are as common in the SCV as complaints about the weather. I thought I addressed traffic whining earlier this year.
  • Saugus School District superintendent, Judy Fish, is retiring after 11 years. SIGNAL
  • Meanwhile, McGrath Elementary, nestled in the hills above Newhall, gets nominated for a blue ribbon for excellence despite the transient nature and socioeconomic status of its student body. Given what McGrath has to work with, I’d say they’re the best elementary school in the SCV. KHTS
  • Ignore all the press releases about Buck McKeon taking over the House Armed Services Committee. What you need to read is this excellent profile of Buck McKeon in Mother Jones magazine. McKeon is poised to become the “most influential Republican on national security issues,” and will clash with Dems, the White House, and other Republicans over detainee policy (“an advocate of detaining terror suspects indefinitely without charge or trial”), the war in A-stan, and Pentagon spending, respectively. Overall, MJ likens his philosophy to a “Cold War on Terror,” which is a great mix of euphemisms and kind of poetic. MOTHER JONES
  • Governor-elect Jerry Brown may ask voters to pay more taxes in a special election next year, according to the Times. Brown wants to “rip off the budget band-aid” and either make huge cuts (to the tune of $28 billion) or ask voters to pay more in taxes. LA TIMES
  • Lynne Plambeck explains why she’s happy with the County’s plastic bag ban. This stat is startling: “Just think — the Santa Clarita Valley has approximately 60,000 families. If each family uses five bags a week, that’s 300,000 bags a week, or 15.6 million bags a year — ­from our community alone.” SIGNAL
  • God I love the Signal. John Boston has a lede from the paper on December 9, 1950, 60 years ago today: “A floating lottery racket, run by Chinamen, was knocked over at the Agua Dulce Dude Ranch by the vice squad.” How excellent is that lede? JOHN BOSTON
  • Some kind person has mashed up great holiday lights in the SCV onto a Google map. CLICKY (ht: Gangfang)
December 9, 2010 – Daily Brief

Comments (51)

  1. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 7:32 am
    Kudos to McGrath, great school with ridiculously hard working teachers.
  2. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 9:38 am
    God help the USA now McKeon is leading the armed services committee. We need more military spending like we need to be shot in the head. The bankrupted boot salesmen leading the ASC, only in America!
  3. BrianDecember 9, 2010 at 9:45 am
    The fox is in charge of the henhouse. Watch the lobbyist donations pile up!
  4. Bill ReynoldsDecember 9, 2010 at 9:56 am
    Yes it is good help, Cash. I couldn’t agree more.
  5. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 10:11 am
    HUH?
  6. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 10:44 am
    Bill pouncing on a typo to skew the intent of your post, only drawing more focus to what you meant to say. Thanks Billy Backfire!
  7. Bill ReynoldsDecember 9, 2010 at 11:24 am
    Hey goofball, who won the Nov 2nd election? That shellacking of Obama’s socialists policies has placed Adults back in power. Whine on, liberals…
  8. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 11:38 am
    Wow, nerve hit! The steady fallback 0f “November 2 CHANGED EVERYTHING” whenever the truth nips at your heels won’t help here, Bill. Neither a liberal, nor am I whining. Keep barking, but wrong tree here. I was commenting on your lack of results as intended. More attention brought to the widespread lack of faith in McKeon’s work is a good thing in my book! So thanks again.
  9. SCV DemDecember 9, 2010 at 12:41 pm
    Harry Reid won, Nancy Pelosi won, Barbara Boxer won. Dems won the Senate. Obama’s popularity is greater than Reagan’s at this point.
  10. Bill ReynoldsDecember 9, 2010 at 1:34 pm
    In case you haven’t noticed, Gallup’s latest pPoll has Bush’s numbers higher than Omama’s. But hey, how’s the weather over there in Namby Pampy Land?
  11. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 11:32 am
    Old soldiers never die they just……….! Bill knows what I meant and I know where he stands. I respect Bills military service and his support for those that fight or have fought. He and I will have to disagree on McKeon and the need to increase funding.
  12. Bill ReynoldsDecember 9, 2010 at 12:47 pm
    No problem Cash. If not for Nov 2nd, can you only imagine who would be charge of that committee, not to mention so many other committees? Hey Gang Fung, your socialist DNC (Party of Food Stamps) got SHELLACKED on Nov 2nd. Live with it. Ha!
  13. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 3:22 pm
    Wrong again, Bill. No way am I a registered Democrat. Honorable attempt at pigeonholing, though.
  14. Bill ReynoldsDecember 9, 2010 at 4:36 pm
    So you’re not a “registered” Democrat, however you do possess liberal behavior.
  15. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 5:19 pm
    Hahahaha…..
  16. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 10:42 am
    Warms my heart to agree 100% with Cash so close to the holidays.
  17. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 10:32 am
    The war. The rich are getting richer buy suppling goods, material and equipment to fight the war, the middle class is getting poorer by having to fund the war, and the poor are being killed fighting the war. And let’s not forget the billons spent to fund the TSA. I ask you, who is winning!
  18. Jim FarleyDecember 9, 2010 at 10:42 am
    Wow Cash. This seems a bit cynical and out of charachter for you. My take is that the soldiers fighting are solidly out of the middle class of our country. The real question is whether the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are/were necessary. I believe they are. There have also been good arguments that they are not worth it. The bottom line in Iraq however is that at least for now we are better off with an Iraq without Sadaam and his two offspring and with the least autocratic government in the mid-east outside Isreal.
  19. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 11:26 am
    Sorry Jim, but I have to ask you, on what do you base your opinion. What business do we have in either country? As far as the middle class fighting the war, I think you will find that many of those killed are very young and that they have not yet even started to create a financial status. I call them poor with no disrespect. I have family fighting in Afghanistan, in less than two months, ten soldiers in the brigade have been killed or wounded and scared for life. Nothing cynical about it.
  20. Jim FarleyDecember 9, 2010 at 12:42 pm
    The loss of every soldier is heartwrenching. That being said I feel the threat of Muslim extremists to harm us is still real. It is better to take the fight to them rather than them to us. Only time will tell but I believe Iraq will be seen as a success in the long run. Afghanistan was necessary to get rid of the Taliban. Of course it is much messier than Iraq. The end game poses some real challenges there.
  21. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 12:58 pm
    Jim, you have done a great job of quoting the party line. All the death and destruction will probably not do what you suggest. I believe this because the very thing this war is trying to stop, will likely occur anyway, and it will come from within. Tens of thousands more have been killed, to defend the honor of those lost on 911. I am sorry, but this does not add up for me, other than I discribe in my previous post.
  22. Jim FarleyDecember 9, 2010 at 1:20 pm
    I’m also on the other side of my wife on this issue. We’ll have to agree to disagree as I don’t want to continue battle on two fronts. Still love ya brother.
  23. SFC PerezDecember 10, 2010 at 11:04 pm
    I am guessing I can validate his point in that most of the young combat Soldiers I either recruited, or served with, were from a middle to upper-middle class family. And they also were from a Caucasian background so that would end the perpetual argument from Vietnam that poor minorities were sent to fight wars. As a Soldier who has served since 1989, I knew from Day 1 the ultimate price I could pay. Nobody forced or coerced me to join nor stay. We serve our Nation and tend to not complain about the physical or financial cost but leave that to the civilians back home who typically have never stepped up to answer the call. I’m not Republican or Democrat, I’m an American Soldier who doesnt pick which wars I feel may be justified in some eyes and look nice in a mini-series on HBO 50 years from now. We do what we do because who else will….
  24. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 10:49 am
    Cash: Don’t forget, you must agree lock stock and smoking barrel with everything within the political, moral & social box others believe you reside in. No drawing outside the lines, now. It’s most frowned upon by the armchair committee of those most high.
  25. gregory molineriDecember 9, 2010 at 11:27 am
    Are you a perpetual dick Gang Fag, or do you just wake up most mornings deciding to be one?
  26. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 11:35 am
    This is a funny comment. Depends on how old GF is, does it not?
  27. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 11:46 am
    And I disagree Cash. A “perpetual dick” (besides sounding like Viagra’s mascot) would be such a thing regardless of age, no?
  28. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 11:57 am
    You’re corect, forget my failed attempt at humor.
  29. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 11:44 am
    Depends…..do you wake up most mornings deciding to be offended by sarcastic internet comments? Try thickening your e-skin, sweetheart. PS – Is the “Gang Fag” comment an after hours offer? Are you and your buys gonna take me to dinner first?
  30. drive66December 9, 2010 at 3:45 pm
    Someone needs to moderated.
  31. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 4:17 pm
    Agreed.
  32. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 11:44 am
    Scarred and scared!
  33. AlpinerDecember 9, 2010 at 12:34 pm
    Is the vulgarity really necessary to make one’s point?
  34. cashDecember 9, 2010 at 12:59 pm
    Rhetorical?
  35. Bill ReynoldsDecember 10, 2010 at 9:45 am
    Uhh, why is war still happening? Why is Gitmo still open for business? Didn’t “The Messiah” (President B. Hussein) promise to end all that during his campaign? Wasn’t all the talk the last two years to end Bush’s tax cuts? Ha! And now it’s abundantly clear that “The Chosen One” cannot control his own Democrat Party (Party of Food Stamps). It’s hilarious to watch…
  36. Library Card Carrying BookreaderDecember 9, 2010 at 11:43 am
    From the Contract between the City and LSSI: {If CONSULTANT believes work not within the Scope of Services (“Additional Work”) is needed to complete the Scope of Services, CONSULTANT will provide the CITY with written notification that contains a specific description of the proposed Additional Work, reasons for such Additional Work, and a detailed proposal regarding cost. Additional Work shall only commence upon written approval by the City Manager or his/her designee.} AND, {In addition, LSSI will develop and fund creation of a combined Service Needs Assessment and Long-Range Strategic Plan (“Strategic Plan”) for the Santa Clarita Public Library, to be coordinated by a nationally renowned expert such as Mr. Ronald Dubberly, in cooperation with the City, elected and appointed local officials, community stakeholders, and the Library Staff.} Dubberly is also President of LSSI’s Public Library Management Operations and therefore an employee of LSSI. Does anyone see a conflict here? If after developing his “Strategic Plan” as “facilitator” for the “Citizens Public Library Advisory Committee” meetings, will Dubberly then turn to the task of providing “written notification that contains a specific description of the proposed Additional Work, reasons for such Additional Work, and a detailed proposal regarding cost?” Will the meetings that he facilitates be used to generate reasons for LSSI to increase the contract costs to the City? Moreover, will it then be too late for Council to do anything but approve such increases? Also in the contract: {CITY shall make available to CONSULTANT without charge adequate space in the libraries to develop and implement new revenue generating services, such as services to the business community, retail sales (books, disks, refreshments, etc.) and other fee based services, to benefit the community, CITY and CONSULTANT (“Additional Services”). CITY will use its best efforts to assist CONSULTANT in the promotion and implementation of Additional Services.} Will Dubberly also be using the committee to survey the community’s needs for coffee blends in a LSSI’s run coffee shop inside the new Newhall Library?
  37. Berta González-HarperDecember 9, 2010 at 1:25 pm
    Hello all. I wanted to bring to your attention, “Pet Photos with Santa”, a wonderful charity event in Santa Clarita, this Saturday December 11 from 10:00AM to 4:00PM, hosted by “Pet Supply” at the corner of Seco Canyon and Bouquet Canyon. The address at Pet Supply is 26831 Bouquet Canyon Road in Saugus (next to the Rite Aide store). Pet Supply donates the use of its store to Santa Clarita Valley Pet Assistance for “Pet Photos with Santa”, a nearly 20 year old tradition and the major fundraising event for the Santa Clarita Valley Chapter of the Pet Assistance Foundation of California. This Saturday December 11 from 10:00AM to 4:00PM is your final opportunity this year to purchase a family keepsake of your precious pet and also have 100 percent of the Tax Deductable proceeds benefit Animal Welfare right here in the Santa Clarita Valley. The extremely high quality digital photos of animals, families and any combination you select, usually costing hundreds of dollars elsewhere, can be purchased starting at just $10. Twenty to fifty or more “shots” will be taken and available for your immediate viewing and selection. You only pay for those photos which you select to purchase. In addition to “Santa”, many local caring volunteers will welcome you and your animals to this annual event to make this a joyous experience. No appointment is necessary. First come, first served. Christmas cards, 8 X 10′s, wallet sizes, photos on CD’s and many more options are all available. The Santa Clarita Pet Assistance Chapter is a 100 percent all volunteer local organization. There is no paid staff and minimal overhead consists of a telephone line. Top professional photographers donate their talent and equipment for this annual event. All the money stays right here in Santa Clarita Valley dedicated for animal welfare, low cost spaying and neutering, and vet bill assistance. Santa Clarita Pet Assistance is dedicated to stopping the ongoing crisis of too many animals for too few forever homes. Pet overpopulation results in the preventable deaths of thousands of great animals each year in our community. Please help this worthy cause. All our Pet Assistance volunteers work diligently to see that everyone gets that priceless “one of a kind” photo of your animal and family so that the result is a picture you will treasure always. Please come by and get that great tax deductable photo you have always wanted knowing that your money goes to help animals right here in Santa Clarita Valley. For additional information: Please call 661-260-3140, leave a message and we will return your call. Thank you. To view samples of our photos please click on the following link: http://scvpetassistance.com/2010PressImages.htm
  38. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 3:24 pm
    Good stuff, Berta. Thanks for posting that.
  39. ReaderMamaDecember 9, 2010 at 5:09 pm
    I know I’m being a little picky, Berta, but if you’re not going to leave a space between paragraphs, can you at least indent? It’s so hard to read something written in one long paragraph.
  40. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 5:21 pm
    Reading “ReaderMama’s” response, I truly laughed out loud while online for the first time in ages! Classic.
  41. Lori RivasDecember 9, 2010 at 2:49 pm
    Don Rickett’s brief provides important events leading to the City Council’s decision to leave COLA, and a great groundwork for the current committee to consider in their service to fellow citizens.
  42. ReaderMamaDecember 9, 2010 at 5:14 pm
    The Signal usually does an article on the holiday lights in town, but so far no sign of it. Thank you to GangFang.
  43. Lori RivasDecember 9, 2010 at 9:41 pm
    FYI, the Library Committee meeting was a sham.
  44. NickelDimeDecember 9, 2010 at 9:56 pm
    in what way?
  45. Lori RivasDecember 9, 2010 at 10:10 pm
    Well, besides all of the preaching (by Dubberly and Pulskamp, mainly) and admonishings that “the decision has been made,” plus the numerous typographical errors (double pages, missing pages, references to another library, instead of our own), precious little work was done (30 minute brainstorming on what SCV will look like in 10 years), the most scant of information was gathered, and the committee members were not given any work to do before the next meeting. Furthermore, one committee member asked if/how she should gather public input, and Dubberly told her that was not necessary — that this committee was chosen for their unique views, and it was intended that committee members only present their own opinions. So, then, another committee member asks, “but what about the community surveys (et al) that the City told us we would gather?” To which Dubberly replied….wait for it…, “the focus groups will be by invitation.” Yup. Library Committee members are to represent themselves and their own opinions (and, I guess, by extension, whatever “community” the City Council thinks they represent), and focus groups will be by invitation only. Nice.
  46. Lori RivasDecember 9, 2010 at 10:14 pm
    I should also mention that after the meeting was closed, and the floor was open to public comments (ie, we rejects sitting in the back were allowed to participate), some mention was made of an email survey — I guess to the City’s email list? And when asked, Darren Hernández agreed that the email should be both in Spanish and English.
  47. Lori RivasDecember 9, 2010 at 10:29 pm
    Plus, here’s a gem: Moorpark City Librarian Barbara Wolfe (of the “I entered this profession with a passion for libraries as a foundational cornerstone of an informed democracy, I did not enter this profession because of the promise of a government pension,” fame) is transitioning to a new position in which she will provide library support to SCV and other libraries. She was at the meeting, too. Acting as the paper monitor.
  48. Lori RivasDecember 9, 2010 at 10:48 pm
    Keep your personal insults to yourself.
  49. Gang FangDecember 9, 2010 at 11:00 pm
    The Jello filled kiddie pool awaits….
  50. Berta González-HarperDecember 9, 2010 at 11:06 pm
    @ Lori if you continue to spread misinformation because you are unhappy with the decisions to both leave the county library system and also because you were not selected to the advisory committee as you yourself commented during public participation at the meeting, you cannot keep me from rebutting your comments. It was not intended as an insult but rather an observation. You are so entrenched in your position, so negative and sour that it would have been pointless to appoint you to work with the rest of us. I hope you will change your mind in future months but will not hold my breath.
  51. Lori RivasDecember 10, 2010 at 9:51 am
    Berta, I am not labeling you, and would appreciate if you would refrain from doing the same.

Preserved as part of the SCV Talk Archive. Text is presented as originally published; presentation has been standardised for readability. The original capture is available at the Internet Archive.

Support