SCV Talk · Archive
Nine years of the Valley’s town square · 2006–2015
SCV Talk
May 12, 2010· scvtalk.com · WordPress (SCVTalk 3.0) · Wayback capture

EXCLUSIVE : New Newhall Library Rendering

This is the revised design of the Newhall Library which broke ground in March and came under fire for its looks. It was approved at last night’s City Council meeting:

Click on pic for larger

Old Rendering:

Rendition of new Newhall Library (September 2009)

My comments:

  • I was afraid a new design would look too western or too Victorian. At first glance, this design strikes a nice balance between the two, incorporating elements from the Victorian buildings on Lyons and some western motifs, especially the windows on the second floor of the big part of the building, which look like 19th Century saloon windows
  • Not sure I dig the flat roof on the large part of the building. But I suppose you have to do that to take away the “Ski Lodge” effect
  • The entrance looks pretty cool and I hope they inline some text like they do in the rendering
  • Apparently the Newhall Library will bring Aston Martin DB9s and Porsche 911s to Newhall
  • There is a bicyclist in the picture, which gives me hope.

I hope this makes the detractors happy (or at least less resistant). Now do we know if the front facade is facing down Main Street?

Once we find that out: BUILD. THE. DAMN. LIBRARY

EXCLUSIVE : New Newhall Library Rendering

Comments (26)

  1. NateMay 12, 2010 at 9:51 am
    I like it better
  2. Barbara J CarterMay 12, 2010 at 10:36 am
    Frankly, it looks about the same to me. I don’t care all that much either way. Just build it already!
  3. Need for Involved CitizenryMay 12, 2010 at 11:55 am
    Does it have a fire place on the right side? Sure looks like it. No place for that or even a design feature that looks like that in a public library.
  4. Kevin D. KorenthalMay 12, 2010 at 12:14 pm
    I like it much better than the previous Ski Chalet design.
  5. Kevin D. KorenthalMay 12, 2010 at 12:15 pm
    It looks like it will bring Toyota Corollas too.
  6. AlanMay 12, 2010 at 12:56 pm
    nothing spectacular…why can’t it be a modern looking building..
  7. OlenkaMay 12, 2010 at 1:22 pm
    I like it better too. Especially the window treatment.
  8. valleynewsgalMay 12, 2010 at 1:48 pm
    not exclusive in the least, hometownstation.com has had the rendering up for awhile….
  9. IMissSCVMay 12, 2010 at 5:13 pm
    You didn’t have it before SCVtalk. I read the KHTS radio story in the morning, but there was no picture. Have some honor, take it back.
  10. mikeMay 12, 2010 at 2:10 pm
    Well if hometownstation.com didn’t have false timestamps on their RSS feed, we could settle it. Failing that, the judges give this round to SCVtalk.
  11. yes, that josh premakoMay 12, 2010 at 2:14 pm
    i’m still trying to find out if the lobby will have a tack piano, to give it that true old west saloon flavor.
  12. mikeMay 12, 2010 at 2:19 pm
    See, I was hoping for something that would really jump out and drink your milkshake.
  13. Saugus SplasherMay 12, 2010 at 2:32 pm
    Will Boydston or Gauny find time in their busy schedules to write something positive about the city paying to build this new library for the LA county library system? Will they find time to write anything critical about LA county building new libraries in Castaic and Acton, but not in Santa Clarita?
  14. TimBen BoydstonMay 12, 2010 at 7:46 pm
    Any County tax dollars that can be spent in the areas of Castaic and Acton for something as worthwhile as a library is a good thing. Not sending our tax dollars outside the valley is also a good thing. Mayor Weste has done an excellent job leading the process to make changes to the library facade resulting in a much grander building. Her further suggestions at last nights Council meeting will make it even better. I would have put the library in Saugus as they don’t have one. Will Saugus Splasher now write under their real name?
  15. David GaunyMay 13, 2010 at 1:18 pm
    As I’ve said many times, I think the library will be great and I’m glad to see it move forward. My concerns were twofold: 1) Previous approval attempts sidelined OTNA and NRC which I think was a mistake. I’m glad this has been rectified. 2) I remain concerned that the library will not be the “anchor” that OTN needs to really get foot traffic to stores/business down there. I fear it may have been oversold in this area. I may be wrong on #2 and I hope I am. No matter what, it will be a beautiful new attraction to the area and I’m glad those most impacted have now had their concerns heard.
  16. BrianMay 12, 2010 at 2:50 pm
    Good question. What is the orientation compared to the American Theatre? (American Legion)
  17. cashMay 12, 2010 at 4:14 pm
    If Queen Weste has her way the building will be perfect. Just ask her. And if McLean has her way Gaston’s will be displaying appliances in front of the 24 million dollar boondoggle. McLean does not mind junking up her neighborhood by parking her motor home in her front yard, so why would she think a few appliances displayed at the curb will hurt the look of our community. I did not pick um!
  18. Whiskey Tango FoxtrotMay 12, 2010 at 11:15 pm
    I read somewhere (was it here?)that this modification cost some $150,000. cha ching, baby!
  19. navigatorMay 13, 2010 at 8:01 am
    I was definitely not thrilled with spending $117,000 for a couple of pencils and erasers to correct the errors in the original plan but at least the new rendering looks better than what we were being told to accept. The window treatments and materials change asked for by the Mayor would help even more. The best part of the whole incident is that the City took us seriously.
  20. SCVgrlMay 13, 2010 at 8:03 am
    I don’t think the flat roof or the fire place is a good idea. Most flat roofs seem to eventually leak. The fireplace is just silly, how many days a year would we really use it? The cost to upkeep it and repair it after every earthquake is going to be huge. Seems like a commitment to waste money.
  21. cashMay 14, 2010 at 2:07 pm
    Fireplace will never be used. Bad for the carbon Footprint.
  22. AlanMay 13, 2010 at 8:09 am
    why does it have to look like a saloon? or look like anything else… why can’t buildings have their own charachter… seems stupid to me…hey why not make it look like a big book..
  23. Christine KMay 13, 2010 at 4:45 pm
    What is interesting about the flat roof thing is that the City (in its wisdom) adopted an ordinance lo these many years ago disallowing flat roofs for residential construction (someone apparently disfavoring Santa Fe style, not to mention California adobe style). I agree about the flat roof leaking problem. And how the flat roof and corbels speak “Victorian” is beyond me – while they “hint” at Victorian they certainly don’t scream Victorian….but hey, build it already.
  24. mikeMay 13, 2010 at 5:11 pm
    why victorian in the first place? Just to match a nearby strip mall?
  25. JeffMay 13, 2010 at 5:13 pm
    It’s not a strip mall!!!!1!! It’s a really original shopping plaza with pretty yellow buildings and a large parking area.
  26. cashMay 17, 2010 at 11:08 am
    When the library does not workout we can always paint the building yellow and open a Spaghetti Factory.

Preserved as part of the SCV Talk Archive. Text is presented as originally published; presentation has been standardised for readability. The original capture is available at the Internet Archive.

Support