SCV Talk · Archive
Nine years of the Valley’s town square · 2006–2015
SCV Talk
April 18, 2012· scvtalk.com · WordPress (SCVTalk 3.0) · Wayback capture

City Makes Final Count and It’s Official-It Was an Incumbent Beatdown!

Some Laurie Ender partisans are quietly whispering that her recent loss was caused by some tactical failures in her campaign, i.e. late start, timing of mailers, etc.  Well, the City Clerk just toted up the final results including provisional and dropped off vote by mails, and, make no mistake, Laurie Ender’s defeat at the hands of TimBen Boydston was the electoral equivalent of a baby seal clubbing, so the current incumbents are whistling past the graveyard if they believe that this was lightning in a bottle.  SIGNAL

Based on the final results TBB beat Laurie Ender by an astounding 737 votes.  (SCVTalk predicted on election night that he would just pad his lead later, so Ms. Ender was right to concede.)  Even more astounding and interesting:  TBB’s total vote count was just 45 votes shy of Laurie Ender’s total when she swept into office in 2008.

Perhaps most astonishing (and revealing):  Bob Kellar with 7,519 votes has set a record for most votes received in a “regular” election.  (He is still beaten by Buck McKeon and JoAnne Darcy in the City formation election in 1987, but remember that folks had FIVE votes to distribute in that election so it is really not comparable.)  He also INCREASED his total vote count from 2008 by a gargantuan 25%!  This from a candidate supposedly “targeted” by the McKeon establishment for defeat.  It seems hilarious now that these folks thought they could oust Mr. Kellar just by wishing for it.

Many think that my previous predictions of incumbent victory served some establishment conspiracy to maintain the status quo.  Nothing could be farther from the truth.  I just like being right and that USED to be the easy way to be right.  But like Paul on the road to Damascus everyone can now count me as one of the converted.  Incumbency will now only work if said incumbent did not alienate a sufficient portion of the (admittedly tiny) electorate, which Laurie Ender obviously did.  With the shield of incumbency gone I want NO more 5-0 decisions, NO more building of consensus, and NO more of this desultory go along to get along BS.  Once the paper weights are flyin’ again in the council chambers, then we will know that everyone is fully engaged!

City Makes Final Count and It’s Official-It Was an Incumbent Beatdown!

Comments (9)

  1. kkorenthalApril 18, 2012 at 1:47 pm
    TimBen Boydston won a City Council Seat for 3 reasons (in order of applicability): 1. After serving briefly as a city councilmemer to fill the remainder of Smyth’s term, TimBan has continually led on the issues of concern for a large number of folks in the community. 2. He ran a very respectful and intelligent campaign both in this cycle and the last time he ran. 3. Local Republicans have had it with the status-quo RINOs that seek to tell us who we will vote for by manipulating endorsements and scaring away money for the challengers.
  2. Need for Involved CitizenryApril 18, 2012 at 2:02 pm
    I might add with respect to item 1 above that the majority of the council was willing to ignore and minimize those same concerns which only enhanced TBB’s appeal to the voter.
  3. Jim FarleyApril 18, 2012 at 6:45 pm
    Agree Kevin. I think it can also be said that Ender actually led a weak campaign. She seemed to be very late out of the starting gate. Tim, perhaps your continued prognostications about the invincibility of incumbency played a role in a bit of complacency on her part. Perhaps she thought she was a shoe-in and did not need to campaign hard? Speculation on my part, and I would not give you full credit (others believed in the invincibility as well), but I think it’s not unreasonable you had a role in her unseating. If that is the case I have to say – Thank You.
  4. Timothy Myers SRApril 19, 2012 at 10:24 am
    Jim: That is the line of the Ender apologists and every underachieving teenager in the USA (If I had tried harder, I would have won!). Statistically it was such a blowout that the only rational conclusion is that a MORE THAN sufficient number of people were extremely upset about the hospital and the library. Bossert is right! It is a new day in SCV politics where actions of elected officials now have consequences, rational ignorance has been wrung out of the system, and I am buying every councilmember a paperweight so they can start heaving it on April 24th!
  5. Jim FarleyApril 18, 2012 at 7:05 pm
    On McKeon, How huge is the fact that his endorsement of both Ender and Hatami got the results it did? His tying into them not only did not pull them up, the tie in is now a rope attached to the boat anchor of the failed Ender and Hatami campaigns that is pulling him down. Fellow Republicans, the time is now to end the McKeon sphere of influence in this valley. As Dylan sang – “The times they are a changin”. We have some important campaigns ahead. While we all have our daily demands please find some time to help one of the alternative candidates. We need to get behind Wilk and Acosta.
  6. Capt. GeneApril 18, 2012 at 7:51 pm
    Testify Brother Farley!
  7. Jim FarleyApril 18, 2012 at 8:14 pm
    Amen Brother – Amen
  8. Cheryl PhillipsApril 18, 2012 at 8:47 pm
    Hey, Jim – I still have 3 TBB yard signs – any ideas on where I can take them or if someone could pick up – I’m in Happy Valley?
  9. AlpinerApril 19, 2012 at 8:21 am
    So in other words Tim, every vote again counts for something…

Preserved as part of the SCV Talk Archive. Text is presented as originally published; presentation has been standardised for readability. The original capture is available at the Internet Archive.

Support